Reflections on the First Week of Spring – “My Idea of Good Company”
This week I reveled in good
company, “the company of clever, well-informed people, who havegreat deal of conversation.” (Jane Austen, Persuasion)
Kelly, a member of the
Meadville Vicinity Pennwriters group, sparked Tuesday’s “great
deal of conversation” with her suggestion, “We should go to a
movie together then talk about it.” After a little organizing of
the writers, I sat in a row with Catherine, Maggie, and Kelly while
Beauty and the Beast
played on a wide movie theater screen. Surrounded by fragrance of
buttered popcorn, I tapped my foot, chuckled, and wiped tears with my
handkerchief.
Afterwards, sitting around a
circular table at Kings Family Restaurant, we critiqued the story
structure.
“Premise driven. Everything
hinges on breaking the spell.”
“This version didn’t have
enough interaction between Belle and the Beast. It doesn’t justify
the change at the end.”
“Too bad the movie
reinforces the expectations that women should tolerate men who act
like beasts and that women can change men.”
After an hour of movie
discussion, Kelly said, “Does anyone want to go to Hippie Chick
with me? I’m going to check if any of the clothes I put on
consignment sold.”
Sated physically on cod
broiled in orange juice and mentally by the conversation, I told
Kelly, “I’ve got to get home.’
I started my car, drove from
my parking space to the edge of five lane Conneaut Lake Road, and
switched on my left turn signal. Cars and pickups streamed from the
right for what seemed like five minutes but was probably only one.
That cleared, and a sea of vehicles, including two semi-trailer
trucks and a motorcycle, passed from the left. When the second flow
finished, traffic streamed from the right again. Sighing, I flipped
the turn signal to the right and followed Kelly’s car.
When I got out of my car,
Kelly stood by the back bumper. “You couldn’t turn left so you
followed me?”
We laughed, plunged into the
racks of consignment clothes, and continued the conversation.
“The blend of colors makes
this fabric attractive.”
“Are butterfly sleeves
comfortable to wear?”
With a butterfly sleeve
blouse, the style Kelly often wears, and a new pair of black jeans, I
turned out of the shopping area at a traffic light and drove on
country roads past leafless trees and flowerless yards.
Saturday, so that I could
join a different set of “clever, well-informed people,” Spence
drove me to Pittsburgh. We passed towering skyscrapers and
crisscrossed layers of arcing bridges that looked like they’d been
designed by Madame De La Grande Bouche, the Beauty and the Beast
wardrobe character that threw streams of fabric into the air.
While Spence wrote articles
in the lobby of The Twentieth Century Club and talked with the coat
check woman about community organizing, I attended Pittsburgh’s
2017 Jane Austen Festival upstairs.
I sat in the second row for
lectures.
“In the nineteenth century,
reviewers focused on humorous, foible-ridden secondary characters
unlike today’s movie emphasis on the romance between main
characters,” a professor said.
“We can enjoy both,” the
Janeite audience shouted
in response.
Another
lecturer prefaced her talk on Jane Austen portraits by saying, “There
is as much controversy over the validity of these portraits as there
is over Fanny Price [the main character of Mansfield Park] in
the Pittsburgh Jane Austen region.”
The
audience laughed.
At lunch, I sat by my friend
Jennifer, owner of Jane Austen Books
and regional coordinator for the Ohio North Coast Jane Austen group.
With a forkful of salmon mid
way to her mouth, Jennifer addressed the young Janeties across the
table from us. “Are you talking about Fanny?”
“Yes. I don’t like Fanny
because she lets people control her,” the woman on the left said.
“She’s not assertive enough to be a heroine.”
Joining the Pittsburgh
controversy, Jennifer said, “There are similarities between Fanny
and Emma (main character of Emma and
character who
acts however
she pleases). Jane explores similar facets of maturing women
in them.” Jennifer ate the salmon and turned to me. “What do you
think about Fanny, Janet”
Jennifer knew full well what
I’d say. “I like Fanny. She accepts her role as the poor relation
but quietly supports others and keeps peace in the family.”
After lunch, I sat in a
circle of women learning to sew pansies out of ribbons. In dim light
and without tables, we balanced ribbons, pins, thread, needles, and
instructions on our laps. Materials slipped to the floor. I dropped
the pink and maroon ribbons, the directions, then a safety pin.
“My needle did a header,”
the woman to my right said bending over and stroking the off-white
carpet with her fingers. “I can’t see to find it.”
The instructor stooped to
recover the needle then threaded it and many other needles for women
with aging eyes.
Squinting and making several
passes, I managed to slip the purple thread through the eye.
We basted and gathered the
ribbons, mashed then into shape, then cobbled the petals and a yellow
velvet center onto stiff backing.
“Would Jane have decorated
clothes with flowers like these?”
“Not this pattern, but yes,
women at that time embellished their dresses with cloth flowers.”
Exhausted from the festival,
I was thankful Spence had accompanied me to the event. While he drove
me home, I enjoyed a “great deal of conversation” with my “clever
well-informed” husband.